Country Living
Country Living, Country Skills
Country People - A Country Living Resource and Community
Message Board
Country Topics
Trading Post
Memory Lane
Country Skills
Country Cooking

The Kitchen

Photo Gallery
Vintage Photos
Special Collections

Country Humor
Country Sounds
Coloring Book
Interactive Story

Farm Tractors
Tractor Parts
Tractor Manuals

Classic Trucks
Antique Tractors
Modern Tractors
Site Map
Links Page
Contact Us

Country Discussion Topics
To add your comments to this topic, click on one of the 'Reply' links below.

Tour De France
[Return to Topics]

RET    Posted 07-28-2004 at 15:47:07       [Reply]  [No Email]
Being he is from Tx, thought someone would have mentioned Lance Armstrongs spectacular win. He is short of miraculous. Can't understand why anyone would think a race like that is boring, but some of you here seem to. There is talk of staging a race in Tx , so then Clod wouldn't have to go to France to see one. Lucky him,

big fred    Posted 07-28-2004 at 19:48:49       [Reply]  [No Email]
I think it's a good idea for France to host athletic events for Americans to win.

Clod    Posted 07-28-2004 at 17:47:00       [Reply]  [No Email]

toolman    Posted 07-28-2004 at 17:02:04       [Reply]  [No Email]
not big on bike races but i seem to recall something on the news up here, about the crowds were spitting on the leader was that armstrong, and that he had beat cancer a while back if that was him he has over come alot to win that race and what else could you expect from french crowds.sad.

TO35    Posted 07-28-2004 at 16:02:58       [Reply]  [No Email]
France is a sore subject with me along with Germany and those "other non US supporters" they did not want to help "liberate" iraq but they sure want some of those rebuilding contracts.....good thing I'm not the Pres. or I'd tell them where they could get off....

France the most conquered country in the world...
espically by "The Greatest Cyclist Ever"

Way to to Lance......usa,usa,usa,usa,usa,usa,usa......wooooooooooooo whooooooooooooooooo


Clod    Posted 07-28-2004 at 16:18:56       [Reply]  [No Email]

Tour De France!

Clod    Posted 07-28-2004 at 16:35:57       [Reply]  [No Email]
Postal Service shouldn't dabble in sports sponsorship

By Sam Ryan


The U.S. Postal Service has just announced that it will not renew its sponsorship of five-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong. With a package price of more than $9 million a year, that should get the American taxpayers' stamp of approval.

Armstrong's departure at the end of this year may sadden his fans, but the decidedly less-competitive Postal Service should never have been in the business of sports sponsorship to begin with.

Today, USPS is $7 billion in debt. According to Treasury Secretary John Snow, "the Postal Service has suffered real economic losses in excess of $101 billion" since 1972. What's more, declining mail volume and soaring costs point to ever increasing taxpayer bailouts for the $67 billion behemoth. Faced with decreasing revenues, the Postal Service should be cutting costs, not lavishing millions on sports teams.

From any management perspective, the Postal Service's sports sponsorships have been an unnecessary drain, if not a disaster - at least for stamp buyers. Besides cycling, USPS has magnanimously bestowed your postage dollars on other professional teams as well, including the impoverished New York Yankees and New York Giants.

In an audit covering 1996-2002, the USPS Office of Inspector General noted that "the Postal Service was unable to track or verify revenue associated with sponsorships." In other words, Postal Service executives may get pricey passes to sports events and locker room privileges, but otherwise they haven't a clue.

Even worse, these cushy deals are riddled with outrageous waste. According to the Office of Inspector General's audit, one postal official ran up a $16,685 tab - including a $259 dinner cruise and first-class airfare - on a trip to watch the Tour de France.

And even as it's doling out these plushy contracts, USPS is currently begging Congress for a $779 million taxpayer-funded handout. So we ask - if sports sponsorships don't do anything revenue-wise, why has USPS pursued them so aggressively in recent years?

The USPS line is that these sponsorships raise its "brand image." With its core, government-monopoly business model foundering, the Postal Service decided to enter the free market and compete against companies like FedEx and UPS in everything from package delivery to telephone calling cards to T-shirts.

Postal Service accounting is murky at best (it doesn't have to report to stockholders and the SEC like a private company), so no one can say for certain whether the Postal Service is losing money in its private-sector adventures. The evidence, however, strongly suggests that stamp buyers and taxpayers are getting fleeced.

Consider labor costs. According to the Presidential Postal Commission, postal employees receive a 28.4 percent pay increase, on average, upon hire.
That's the main reason labor accounts for nearly 80 percent of Postal Service costs, compared with roughly 50 percent at private delivery firms.

With this massive premium on labor - and no real profit incentive - the Postal Service almost certainly loses money when it competes in the private sector.

Moreover, as a government agency with a federally-enforced monopoly on letter mail delivery, does the Postal Service have any business competing against private companies in the first place? The Postal Service doesn't pay taxes or parking tickets. It's immune from anti-trust law and SEC transparency requirements. In fact, it's even immune from the Federal Trade Commission's truth-in-advertising rules, so it can assert anything it wants in its costly commercials. Few people know that USPS can craft legally binding regulations designed to hinder competitors - and then use its own police force to enforce them.

As a government agency with little accountability or oversight, what on earth is the USPS doing reaching into private markets and competing against legitimate tax-paying private businesses? What is it doing sponsoring sports teams and claiming it's just another company in the market?

This behemoth should get back to its core mission of just delivering America's regular mail. Terminating Lance's contract is a step in the right direction.

As the greatest cyclist in the world, Lance should have little difficulty finding a new sponsor. The Postal Service, on the other hand, seems to have lost its bearings.

Sam Ryan is a senior fellow of the Lexington Institute in Arlington, Va. Contact him at

JB    Posted 07-28-2004 at 16:47:42       [Reply]  [No Email]
I'm witchu on that! I'd just as soon the PO sticks to delivering mail! Let the bike manufacturers and sports related mfgs sponsor the tours. All I want is my mail, and you don't gotta gussy it up with purty stamps. One with an old picture of Washington on it suits me. (Either the White House or George, makes no nevermind!)

ron,ar    Posted 07-28-2004 at 16:44:39       [Reply]  [No Email]
I thought I said that same thing last night. But "somebody" misunderstood my comments :^)

Clod    Posted 07-28-2004 at 16:50:55       [Reply]  [No Email]
There is a stamp for our greatest hero Malcom X.It is in a big picture frame in a postoffice near the capitol bld.

toolman    Posted 07-28-2004 at 17:05:27       [Reply]  [No Email]
now theres a real hero.

Clod    Posted 07-28-2004 at 17:22:45       [Reply]  [No Email]
Yes,,I think he won the tour De France on a tricycle.

Clod    Posted 07-28-2004 at 18:44:48       [Reply]  [No Email]
One of my concerns is the cancellation process of the mail. This process is what ensures that the letter is delivered on time and also provides a revenue protection tool. Right know, we have evidence that they are lots of letter that are by-passing this cancellation process and going straight to the processing systems un-cancelled. These pieces of mail can be in the plant for days going through the process of delivery and there is no way of knowing if the mail was delivered overnight as required (first class mail) or if it has been in the system days awaiting distribution, as often happens. We are concerned that customers are not receiving the service that they are paying for, damaging the confidence they should have in our Postal Service. This leads to the lack of support and the increase in loss of revenue we are undergoing now days.

Also we have had the loss of four payrolls from different postal installations including the AMF which is highly observed by the postal inspectors and we have almost no security

[Return to Topics]

[Home] [Search]

Copyright © 1999-2013
All Rights Reserved
A Country Living Resource and Community