|
Country Talk Discussion Board |
Re: Court orders Christian child
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Post Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by screaminghollow on August 28, 2009 at 08:37:18 from (209.86.226.35):
In Reply to: Court orders Christian child posted by into government education on August 28, 2009 at 05:35:45:
What is on the other side of the story? Lets just pretend that this is like a case I HAD TWO years ago. Parents get divorced after Mommy ges of the religious deep end. Daddy eventually moves on and remarries. momma and her good Christian friends home school their kids. Teach them that abortion is wrong, very very wrong. In fact so wrong, that good Christians mustdo whatever it takes to stop i, even kill the doctors and nurses in the name of th Lord. ALSO< divorce is wrong. divorce i tribl. Anyone who ges a divorc is evil, and good Christians should not even associat with such sinners. Since divorce s wrong, a person who gets divorced and remarries, is an adulterer and fornicator because God doesn't recognize divorce. In fact Daddy got divorced and remarried, therefore he is evil and is going to heckk. Anbody that asociates with Daddy is going to burn in everlasting flames of you know where. I have seen children so indoctrinated that they flee in horror of going flames of heck if they even talk to or look at their sinner Daddy. And when a judge calls an end to such BS, suddenly Momma is claiming that the Courts are persecuting her for her good Christian Beliefs. Perhaps because the Court wants the child to be exposed to other points of view? (When my EX described someone as "good Christians " it set off all kinds of alarms in my head, because for awhile, she went off such a deep end. ) There was US Supreme Court case in th 1940's concerning a young school boy who refused to say th Pledge of Allegiance,because his Christian faith taught him that the flag was a graven image, and that his ony allegiance was to be to God. Gobitz vs Minersville School Board. They suspended the kid and his sister from school because the childen refused to say the pledge and a group dedicated to "religious freedom" took the case all the way to the Supreme Court. There was a growing anti gov't movement among soe Christian groups at that time and within a few years, to placate such fundamentalist Christians, Congress added the phrase "under God" to the Pledge. Nope, I wonder what the rest of the story may be.
Replies:
[Home]
[Search]
Copyright © 1999-2007 Yesterday's Tractor Co. - All Rights Reserved
A Country Living Resource and Community
Terms of Use |
Privacy Statement |
Contact Us
| 